Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever

 Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever

 When facing a charge of driving without insurance, and a technical defence isn't available, the primary goal shifts to avoiding the significant penalty points (6-8) that usually accompany a conviction. The only legal mechanism to achieve this, after pleading guilty, is the complex and highly specific "special reasons" argument. Successfully p

 When facing a charge of driving without insurance, and a technical defence isn't available, the primary goal shifts to avoiding the significant penalty points (6-8) that usually accompany a conviction. The only legal mechanism to achieve this, after pleading guilty, is the complex and highly specific "special reasons" argument. Successfully p

 Almost no one intentionally sets out to drive without insurance. It is one of the most serious yet commonly committed motoring offences, and in the vast majority of cases, it happens by complete accident. An administrative oversight, a simple misunderstanding of the policy terms, or a missed renewal email can be all it takes for a law-abiding